Style Underperformer:
- Small-Cap Growth (-2.65%)
- 1) Steel -4.35% 2) Coal -3.20% 3) Networking -3.15%
- IOC, SU, IMO, C, DMND, AWAY, SHPGY, QCOM, GIFI, AMCX, SWKS, NATR, AMZN, PID, SNN, RFG, IWW, SFL, PTI, IJT, BCA, ISH, PEJ, SMG, LEN, EWT, CSC, FPO, AMCX, FAS, LNKD, LNG, RCL, FIO, P, RATE and GRPN
- 1) STI 2) DTV 3) MTG 4) KRE 5) MDT
- 1) LUFK 2) BIG 3) JNY 4) QCOM 5) DMND
1 comment:
New Trove of Stolen E-Mails From Climate Scientists Is Released
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/23/science/earth/new-trove-of-stolen-e-mails-from-climate-scientists-is-released.html?_r=1&hpw
While the emails do not show the 'global warming isn't happening' nor do they show 'global warming is a hoax', they do show that a cabal of climate scientists (and they include many of the most prominent) have worked together to shape what the journals publish and what the public hears about climate science, often overtly supporting false statements of current and future risk, successfully attempting to stifle scientific findings that did not support 'the cause' [their term, not mine] regardless of the correctness of the finding, deleting emails to prevent these activities from being exposed, conspiring to circumvent FOI laws (both in the US and the UK), colluding on how to represent/misrepresent information about climate change to best support their cause, encouraging other scientists not to release contrary findings, failing to speak out when another scientists overtly misrepresents (read 'lies') data in public statements, interfering in the peer review process that is intended to guarantee that published research findings are sound, interfering in the IPCC process, ....this list goes on and on.
For those who wish to brush this mess under the rug, please think of what your reaction would be if the authors of these emails were doctors speaking about research some new disease and the drugs to combat it. Pushing their own agenda and fighting to bury any dissenting evidence,, prevent medical journals from publishing dissenting papers, trying to get other doctors and medical researchers thrown out of professional societies because their findings disagreed and might hurt 'the cause'. The public and the press would be screaming for professional and legal censure.
Science, properly and honestly done, is what protects us from the forces of chaotic nature. These men have violated our trust as scientists.
Post a Comment